TES and CAES are challenging battery storage

According to new analysis thermal and compressed air technology are already cheaper energy storage solutions than battery storage.

Share
TES and CAES are challenging battery storage

According to new analysis by BloombergNEF, thermal and compressed air technology are already cheaper energy storage solutions than battery storage.

The latest research shows the growing competition faced by lithium-ion batteries from emerging long duration energy storage (LDES) solutions. Despite being in the early stages, certain LDES options, like thermal energy and compressed air energy storage (CAES), are demonstrating cost advantages over lithium-ion for longer durations.

Thermal energy storage and CAES, for example, have an average capital expenditure of $232/kWh and $293/kWh, respectively. Lithium-ion batteries meanwhile came in at $304/kWh for four-hour duration systems.

Experts highlight the crucial role of supportive policies and continuous technological advancements in promoting the broader adoption of LDES and boosting their competitiveness with lithium-ion batteries.

The news of the adoption of the Net Zero Industry Act by Governments across the EU will certainly help here too. Julia Souder, CEO of the Long Duration Energy Storage Council, said "It’s clear LDES technologies have entered into a virtuous cycle where growing market adoption is spurring increasing innovation and cost efficiencies.".

© 2026 EnergyInsider. All rights reserved. EnergyInsider is a trading name of Blueberry Drive Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales (company number 14338902). Registered office: 167-169 Great Portland Street, 5th Floor, London W1W 5PF. The information published on EnergyInsider is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other form of professional advice. Nothing on this site should be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any security or financial instrument. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decision. EnergyInsider accepts no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information published on this site.